AI content labelling policy (Art. 50 AI Act)
When and how CoinPaprika labels the content it publishes that was generated or modified by AI, in line with Article 50 of the EU AI Act.
Last updated: 30 September 2026
1. Purpose and legal basis
This policy sets out when and how CoinPaprika (the Company) labels the content it publishes that was generated or modified by AI, to comply with Article 50 of Regulation (EU) 2024/1689 (the AI Act). These obligations apply from 2 August 2026, and the Digital Omnibus did not postpone them for deployers of AI, which includes the Company. Content generated before that date does not need to be labelled retroactively, with one exception: text generated earlier but published later is covered by this policy.
| Source | What it means for the Company | Status |
|---|---|---|
| Art. 50(4) AI Act | We disclose deep fakes and AI-generated text published to inform the public on matters of public interest | Applies from 2 August 2026 |
| Art. 50(5) AI Act | The label must be clear and distinguishable, visible at the latest at the first interaction with or exposure to the content, and meet accessibility requirements | Applies from 2 August 2026 |
| Art. 50(1) and (2) AI Act | Obligations of AI tool providers: disclosure in chatbots and machine-readable marking of outputs | Applies to providers; for systems placed on the market before 2 August 2026, the marking deadline is 2 December 2026 |
| Commission guidelines on Art. 50 | Interpretation of terms: deep fake, matters of public interest, editorial control | Final version of 20 July 2026, non-binding |
| Code of practice | Voluntary standard for labelling and the EU icons; following it makes compliance easier to demonstrate | Final version of 10 June 2026 |
| Polish Act on Artificial Intelligence Systems | The supervisory authority is the Commission for the Development and Safety of Artificial Intelligence (KRiBSI) | Journal of Laws 2026, item 1003, in force since 11 August 2026; penalty provisions from 28 October 2026 |
The policy follows a precautionary principle: when in doubt whether content falls under Article 50, we label it.
2. Scope
The policy applies to everyone who creates, commissions or publishes content on the Company's behalf: employees, contractors, agencies and freelancers. It also covers automations, that is, scheduled jobs that publish content without human involvement.
| Channel | Typical content |
|---|---|
| coinpaprika.com and dexpaprika.com | Coin and exchange descriptions, educational articles, images, ranking pages |
| Social media (X, Instagram, Facebook and the Company's other profiles) | Posts, threads, images, reels, automatically generated captions |
| Newsletter and email campaigns | Text, images |
| External publications | Press releases, guest articles, public presentations, sponsored content |
The policy covers four forms: images, video, audio and text, including when they are combined.
Out of scope:
- internal material the Company does not publish,
- charts, tables and images assembled from market data with a template, without a generative model,
- minor technical editing that does not change the content: spelling and grammar correction, format conversion, cropping, noise reduction.
Partner content published on the Company's channels (e.g. sponsored posts) is treated as our own, as a precaution; the partner declares whether they used AI. For third-party content that we only share, Article 50 places no obligation on the Company, but we do not remove existing labels.
3. Definitions
Terms follow the AI Act and the Commission's explanations of Article 50.
| Term | Meaning in this policy |
|---|---|
| AI content | Images, video, audio or text generated entirely or substantially modified by an AI system. |
| Deep fake | AI-generated or manipulated image, audio or video content that resembles existing persons, objects, places, entities or events and would falsely appear to a person to be authentic. The Commission also includes realistic scenes that could plausibly exist. |
| Text on matters of public interest | Text published to inform the public on, among other things, politics, public administration, health, consumer safety, and economic, financial, scientific and cultural events. At the Company, this mainly means market news and commentary, analyses and texts about regulation. |
| Human review | A deliberate check of the substance of the content by a person who knows the subject. At a minimum, this means checking the facts. Proofreading, formal sign-off and review by another AI model are not enough. |
| Editorial control | The authority to approve, change or reject a text on substantive grounds, including checking facts and sources. |
| Editorial responsibility | A designated person is responsible for the publication of the text. Without one, the labelling exception does not apply. |
| First exposure | The moment a person first sees or hears the content. |
| Deployer | The Company, when it uses an AI system in its activities. An employee acting on its instructions is not a separate deployer. |
| Provider | The maker of an AI tool the Company uses. |
4. When we label
Labelling is mandatory in two cases: when we publish a deep fake, and when we publish AI-generated text on matters of public interest whose substance has not been reviewed by a human. In all other cases labelling is voluntary, and the Company recommends it.
Did AI generate or substantially modify the content?
- no
No label
- yes
What kind of content is it?
- image, video, audio
Does it look realistic, and could it pass as authentic?
- yes
We label itsatire: discreetly (labelling required)
- no
Labelling voluntary
- yes
- text
Is it published to inform the public on matters of public interest?
- no
Labelling voluntary
- yes
Has an editor reviewed it, with the review documented?
- no
We label it (labelling required)
- yes
No labeleditorial exception
- no
- no
- image, video, audio
labelling required
Read the tree from the top; the table below gives examples from the Company's channels.
| Content | Classification | Decision |
|---|---|---|
| Photorealistic AI image or video (people, places, events, objects) | Deep fake | We label it |
| A real person's likeness or voice generated by AI | Deep fake | Not published without that person's consent and a lawyer's approval; always labelled |
| Realistic AI voice-over in a reel or audio recording | The guidelines do not settle the question when the voice does not imitate a specific person | We label it as a precaution |
| Satire or meme in a realistic style | Deep fake in an evidently satirical work | Labelled discreetly, without hampering enjoyment of the work; when it is meant to inform or sell, labelled like any deep fake |
| Illustration in a clearly unrealistic style (drawing, abstract) | Not a deep fake | Labelling voluntary, recommended |
| Image assembled from market data with a template | Not AI content | Not labelled |
| Automated post or caption with market commentary, published without human involvement | AI text about financial events, not reviewed | We label it |
| Article or analysis written with AI assistance and reviewed for substance by an editor | Editorial control exception | Not labelled; the review is documented |
| Coin or exchange description generated at scale | Borderline case: the Commission excludes product descriptions, but a description of a financial asset may inform on financial matters | To be settled with a lawyer; until then, we label descriptions not reviewed by a human |
| Promotional text, product feature announcement | Not a matter of public interest, unless it makes claims about health or consumer safety | Not labelled |
The editorial control exception requires a real review by a person who knows the subject. The review must be the last substantive step: a later substantial change made by AI cancels the exception. The same rules apply to translations, summaries and paraphrases produced by AI. The code of practice expects a documented review procedure; the Company documents the review of every text.
5. How we label
The label can be read without clicking, is visible at the latest at first exposure, and is built into the content itself so that it survives downloading and resharing. Information hidden in the terms of service, in a menu or in a general note about the use of AI does not meet the requirement. Nor does the Company consider a footer or a profile description sufficient.
| Format | Label | Where and when |
|---|---|---|
| Image | The EU “AI” icon with a caption, or the text alone, e.g. “AI-generated” | In a corner of the image, contrasting with the background. Repeated in the first line of the caption and at the start of the alt text. |
| Video | An on-screen icon or text | From the first second. The Company's standard: throughout for content up to 60 seconds; for longer content, at the start, at regular intervals and after every break. |
| Audio | A spoken notice | At the start of the recording. Repeated in the episode or post description. |
| Text on a web page | A written note | Above the text or at its start, by the title. |
| Text in a post | A written note | In the same post, not in a comment or a later post in the thread. |
| Carousels and combined content | As above, for each element | Each slide or track containing AI content is labelled separately. |
Common rules:
- The label is in the same language as the content.
- The EU icons come in three variants: basic, “fully AI-generated” and “partially AI-modified”. Using them is voluntary. The Company uses the icon together with a written caption, because the Commission's research shows it is better understood that way.
- We always switch on platform labels (e.g. “AI info” on Instagram and Facebook). The guidelines allow relying on them, but responsibility stays with the Company, so a label in the content itself remains the standard.
- We do not remove machine-readable markings or metadata added by an AI tool. A machine-readable marking does not replace a visible label.
- Accessibility: information about AI goes into the alt text and ARIA labels, and stays on screen long enough to be read.
- In evidently artistic or satirical works, the label may be discreet, e.g. a smaller icon in a corner or a note in the caption.
Ready-made wording in Polish and English is in the “Label wording” section below.
6. Roles and responsibilities
The author of the content is responsible for labelling it correctly, and the approver for clearing it for publication. The same person does not hold both roles for the same piece of content.
| Role | Responsible for |
|---|---|
| Author | Declaring the use of AI, classifying the content, applying the label |
| Reviewing editor | Reviewing the substance of the text and documenting the review; holds editorial responsibility for the text |
| Approver | The pre-publication check and the decision to publish |
| Automation owner | Templates with a built-in label and a quarterly review of a sample |
| Policy owner | Resolving doubts, training, reviewing the policy, contact with legal counsel and the supervisory authority |
| Management board | Approving the policy and its changes |
7. Errors, reports and review
Errors and corrections. We fix a missing or incorrect label within 24 hours of finding it. If a platform does not allow editing, we remove the content and republish it with a label. We document every case, together with its cause.
Reports. You can report a missing or incorrect label through our contact form. Reports go to the policy owner.
Review. The policy owner reviews this policy every 6 months and after every change to the Commission's guidelines, the code of practice or KRiBSI's position.
Label wording
| Situation | Polish | English |
|---|---|---|
| Image or video entirely generated by AI | Wygenerowano przez AI | AI-generated |
| Human-made content modified by AI | Zmodyfikowano przy użyciu AI | Modified with AI |
| AI voice, notice at the start of the recording | Ten materiał zawiera głos wygenerowany przez AI. | This content includes an AI-generated voice. |
| Automatically published post | Post wygenerowany automatycznie przez AI | Automatically generated by AI |
| Text on a web page, not reviewed | Ten tekst wygenerowała AI. Nie był weryfikowany przez redakcję. | This text was generated by AI and has not been reviewed by an editor. |
| Satire in a realistic style | Satyra. Obraz wygenerowany przez AI | Satire. AI-generated image |
| Text reviewed by an editor, voluntary label | Tekst powstał z pomocą AI i został sprawdzony przez redakcję CoinPaprika. | Written with AI assistance and reviewed by the CoinPaprika editorial team. |
Sources
- European Commission: questions and answers on Article 50, guidelines on Article 50 (full text), code of practice, EU icons
- Text of the regulation: Article 50 AI Act
- Poland: Act on Artificial Intelligence Systems (Journal of Laws 2026, item 1003)